Skip to content
Published by Hair Labs Kensington, London Batch 001 US release note May 2026

In brief.

Grey hair is not one deficiency. It is a six-driver failure at the follicle. Anti Grey 1.0 is the first protocol to leave the Hair Labs greying model: the five-compound NooPigment Matrix™, the Co-Factor Circuit around it, and pairwise modelling across the finished two-capsule protocol.

Literature corpus. More than six hundred candidates read against greying mechanisms, not category ingredients.
Six-driver map. Signalling, stress load, substrate supply, methylation, fibre structure, and oxidative pressure.
In silico filter. Matrix and Circuit compounds scored against each other before the dose map was locked.
Finished protocol. Anti Grey 1.0 is the first greying formulation to leave the model.
Batch 001 field signal. Sixty respondents answered the same question set at months 3–6 on oral protocol. 92% reported less new grey.
§ 01.

The six drivers.

Greying is not one failure. Six biological drivers converge on a single outcome — the pigment cell stops arriving at the follicle. The ledger below keeps the diagnosis and modelled response together before the field comparison and formulation.

  1. Stem-cell depletion & signalling failure.

    The pigment reserve can become stranded in the upper bulge. Sun 2023. Endothelin-1 / Ednrb signalling then fails, and the follicle stops recruiting colour. Iida 2024. The older foundation is incomplete melanocyte stem-cell maintenance in the niche. Nishimura 2005.

    Response  ·  · 100 mg · from Sophora japonica flower bud · standardised to ≥98%.

  2. Chronic stress-hormone load.

    Noradrenaline released by sympathetic nerves can empty the pigment reserve in mice. Human single-hair mapping links stress load and reversal under threshold conditions. Zhang 2020; Rosenberg 2021.

    Response  ·  · 300 mg · standardised withanolides  ·  · 100 mg · standardised rosavins and salidroside.

  3. Substrate & co-factor insufficiency.

    Melanin synthesis needs l-tyrosine as substrate and copper-bound tyrosinase as the rate-limiting enzyme. Slominski 2012.

    Response  ·  · 500 mg  ·  · 1.5 mg · as gluconate.

  4. Impaired methylation & metabolic support.

    The one-carbon cycle supplies methyl groups pigment-cell function relies on. Deficiency signals around Colecalciferol, Cobalamin, Folate, and lower-normal Biotin are reported in premature-canities cohorts; this is support biology, not a reversal claim. Bhat 2013; Daulatabad 2017.

    Response  ·  · 100 µg  ·  · 400 µg  ·  · 10 mg  ·  · 100 mg  ·  · 50 mg  ·  · 25 µg.

  5. Structural integrity deficits.

    The shaft has to hold the colour the follicle lays down. Biotin and pantothenic acid support the keratin and energy lane behind tensile strength.

    Response  ·  · 5 mg.

  6. Oxidative stress in the follicle.

    Hydrogen peroxide accumulates as catalase activity declines; the redox environment oxidises melanogenic enzymes and shaft structure. Wood 2009; Trüeb 2009.

    Response  ·  · 100 mg.

§ 02.

The field.

Most approaches to greying address one driver, sometimes two. Anti Grey 1.0 is written against the full six-driver map: signalling, stress load, substrate supply, methylation, fibre structure, and oxidative pressure, then checked by pairwise modelling before release.

Category
Vitamin-complex stacksCobalamin, folate, pyridoxine, biotin at variable doses.
Fo-Ti formulationsSafety signal in the published liver-injury record. See § 06.
Topical copper peptidesReach the follicle surface; systemic pathway coverage absent.
Topical density topicalsCaffeine, minoxidil — hair density and breakage, not pigment biology.
Anti Grey 1.0NooPigment Matrix, Co-Factor Circuit, and pairwise-modelled dose/form. See § 03.
FIG. 01 · COVERAGE MAP · THE FIELD BEFORE ANTI GREY 1.0. addresses at scored dose and form partial outside the pathway

A formulation is not the sum of its compounds; it is the sum of which drivers they cover together, at dose. Anti Grey 1.0 is the modelled answer: Matrix, Circuit, and pairwise constraints mapped back to the six-driver field.

§ 03.

The formulation.

The NooPigment Matrix™ is the five-compound answer at the centre of the model. The Co-Factor Circuit sits around it: eight supporting compounds that keep the Matrix usable inside one two-capsule protocol. Together they answer signalling, stress load, substrate supply, methylation, fibre structure, and oxidative pressure.

NooPigment Matrix™

Five compounds.

Dose, form, driver code, and monograph route.

  1. 01 D01 · D06

    100 mg

    Preserves endothelin signalling between keratinocyte and melanocyte stem cells; suppresses senescent p16ink4a+ stem-cell accumulation in the bulge; attenuates peroxide-type oxidative stress at the follicle.

    Iida et al., 2024.

  2. 02 D03

    500 mg

    The biological substrate of melanogenesis — fed into tyrosinase-driven pigment synthesis. Coupled to Copper (Circuit) as its catalytic cofactor.

    Slominski et al., 2012.

  3. 03 D02

    300 mg

    HPA-axis modulation; the slower arm of the stress lane. Sustains the biochemical stage on which the pigment lane can run.

    Chandrasekhar et al., 2012.

  4. 04 D02

    100 mg

    Sympathetic-nerve buffering — the acute-stress arm, mapped to the Zhang 2020 axis where noradrenaline empties the pigment reserve in a single shot.

    Darbinyan et al., 2007.

  5. 05 D04

    100 mg

    Methyl-group donor via betaine; the bridge between the stress lane and the methylation lane the Circuit carries. Included as the active methylation support, not as a standalone greying claim.

    One-carbon-cycle formulation rationale.

Formulation note

The Matrix is not the protocol on its own. The Circuit keeps each Matrix compound inside range and carries substrate, methylation, redox, and structural support.

Co-Factor Circuit

Eight co-factors.

The dependency layer, mapped to the same six-driver field.

  1. 01 D01 · D06

    100 mg

    Regenerates Luteolin at its reversible redox intermediates — the coupling worked in full as FIG. 04.

  2. 02 D03

    1.5 mg

    Tyrosinase's catalytic cofactor — L-Tyrosine does nothing pigment-wise without it. As gluconate; form chosen to coexist with the vitamin complex.

  3. 03 D04

    100 μg

    Initiates methionine synthase and homocysteine recycling. The cobalt-centred vitamer at the top of the one-carbon cycle.

  4. 04 D04

    400 μg

    Bio-ready methyl donor for the remethylation step. Form selected to work across common MTHFR genotypes.

  5. 05 D04 · D06

    10 mg

    Closes the homocysteine loop via trans-sulphuration. Also activates melanogenic enzymes on the pigment lane.

  6. 06 D05

    5,000 μg

    Keratin-carboxylase cofactor — carries driver 05 (structural integrity) on its own; a healthy scaffold for new colour to land on.

  7. 07 D05

    50 mg

    Coenzyme A — the energy lane that keratin synthesis runs on. Paired with Biotin across the structural driver.

  8. 08 D04 · D05

    1,000 IU

    Endocrine support of the methylation and structural lanes. The widely-deficient modern vitamer kept at physiological maintenance dose.

Materia medica record

The Matrix and Circuit are the formulation architecture. Pairwise modelling is the apparatus that tests whether that architecture can hold together as one protocol. The next chapter — § 04 — shows the constraint test.

§ 04.

The apparatus.

Pairwise modelling is the in silico apparatus behind the greying protocol. FIG. 03 publishes the NooPigment Matrix™: five compounds, ten Matrix × Matrix checks, five constraints per pair. The same constraint model is then run across the Co-Factor Circuit, producing seventy-eight pair checks across the finished two-capsule protocol. FIG. 04 works one dependency — Luteolin × Ascorbic Acid — in full.

NooPigment Matrix pairwise apparatus — five Matrix compounds on a pentagonal ring, ten Matrix edges, with one dashed extension to Ascorbate marking FIG.04 (Luteolin × Ascorbic Acid). LUTEOLIN L-TYROSINE ASHWAGANDHA RHODIOLA CHOLINE ASCORBATE COFACTOR SEE FIG. 04 → 10 PAIRS C(5,2)
LUTEOLIN L-TYROSINE ASHWAGANDHA RHODIOLA CHOLINE ASCORBATE COFACTOR 10 PAIRS · C(5,2) SEE FIG. 04 →
  1. 01 Luteolin × L-Tyrosine RX · CF Luteolin preserves the oxidative environment tyrosinase operates in; L-Tyrosine is the substrate that enzyme acts on. The redox lane and the pigment-substrate lane meet here.
  2. 02 Luteolin × Ashwagandha RX · 2C Complementary lanes — Luteolin on the pigment-cell niche, Ashwagandha on baseline stress load. No redox conflict at either one's scored dose.
  3. 03 Luteolin × Rhodiola RX · 2C Pigment-cell niche meets the acute-stress buffer. Formulation physics set so neither vitamer steals antioxidant headroom from the other.
  4. 04 Luteolin × Choline MT · AF Luteolin's action benefits from intact methylation; Choline supplies methyl groups via betaine. No interference at selected forms and doses.
  5. 05 L-Tyrosine × Ashwagandha 2C · AF Pigment substrate alongside stress-axis modulation. Dose packing survives the two-capsule envelope; absorption windows do not conflict.
  6. 06 L-Tyrosine × Rhodiola AF · 2C Tyrosine and Rhodiola share no transporter competition at the selected forms. Co-dosed inside the envelope.
  7. 07 L-Tyrosine × Choline MT · CF Tyrosine metabolism runs through the one-carbon cycle; Choline supports the methylation lane that feeds it.
  8. 08 Ashwagandha × Rhodiola 2C · AF Adaptogen pair — baseline and acute stress axes. Dosed within the two-capsule envelope; withanolides and rosavin/salidroside at standardised strengths.
  9. 09 Ashwagandha × Choline MT · AF Cortisol-axis modulation supports the methylation cycle; Choline completes the methyl-donor input.
  10. 10 Rhodiola × Choline MT · AF Sympathetic buffering meets the methylation bridge. Fits the two-capsule envelope; no absorption conflict.

10 / 10 Matrix pairs · constraint-scored

FIG. 03 NOOPIGMENT MATRIX™ · PAIRWISE INTERACTION APPARATUS. Five Matrix compounds produce ten Matrix × Matrix pairs. Each pair is scored against RX, CF, MT, AF, and 2C. The full formulation carries the same constraint model across the Matrix and Co-Factor Circuit.
Constraint codes
  • RX Redox compatibility — the pair does not oxidise, quench, or deactivate each other.
  • CF Cofactor dependency — one compound enables the enzymatic action of the other.
  • MT Methylation lane fit — both operate against the same one-carbon / homocysteine cycle.
  • AF Absorption & form — salt, vitamer, and chelate forms chosen for joint bioavailability.
  • 2C Two-capsule discipline — the pair survives dose packing without exceeding the envelope.
Pair Interaction Scored Note
01 Luteolin × L-Tyrosine RX · CF Luteolin preserves the oxidative environment tyrosinase operates in; L-Tyrosine is the substrate that enzyme acts on. The redox lane and the pigment-substrate lane meet here.
02 Luteolin × Ashwagandha RX · 2C Complementary lanes — Luteolin on the pigment-cell niche, Ashwagandha on baseline stress load. No redox conflict at either one's scored dose.
03 Luteolin × Rhodiola RX · 2C Pigment-cell niche meets the acute-stress buffer. Formulation physics set so neither vitamer steals antioxidant headroom from the other.
04 Luteolin × Choline MT · AF Luteolin's action benefits from intact methylation; Choline supplies methyl groups via betaine. No interference at selected forms and doses.
05 L-Tyrosine × Ashwagandha 2C · AF Pigment substrate alongside stress-axis modulation. Dose packing survives the two-capsule envelope; absorption windows do not conflict.
Complete NooPigment Matrix™ register.
06 L-Tyrosine × Rhodiola AF · 2C Tyrosine and Rhodiola share no transporter competition at the selected forms. Co-dosed inside the envelope.
07 L-Tyrosine × Choline MT · CF Tyrosine metabolism runs through the one-carbon cycle; Choline supports the methylation lane that feeds it.
08 Ashwagandha × Rhodiola 2C · AF Adaptogen pair — baseline and acute stress axes. Dosed within the two-capsule envelope; withanolides and rosavin/salidroside at standardised strengths.
09 Ashwagandha × Choline MT · AF Cortisol-axis modulation supports the methylation cycle; Choline completes the methyl-donor input.
10 Rhodiola × Choline MT · AF Sympathetic buffering meets the methylation bridge. Fits the two-capsule envelope; no absorption conflict.
Full formulation model.

The ten Matrix pairs above are the visible apparatus. The same in silico constraint model is run across the Co-Factor Circuit before the two-capsule protocol is locked.

NooPigment Matrix™ × NooPigment Matrix™
10 checks
NooPigment Matrix™ × Co-Factor Circuit
40 checks
Co-Factor Circuit × Co-Factor Circuit
28 checks
Total modelled denominator
78 pair checks
Six-driver assembly.

The pair checks are not abstract. They return to the greying map: six biological drivers, one finished protocol.

  1. D01

    Signalling.

    Luteolin carries the signalling answer; Ascorbic Acid protects the reversible redox window around it.

  2. D02

    Stress load.

    Ashwagandha and Rhodiola split the stress lane: baseline HPA-axis load and acute sympathetic stress.

  3. D03

    Substrate supply.

    L-Tyrosine supplies the melanin precursor; Copper supplies the tyrosinase cofactor.

  4. D04

    Methylation.

    Choline, Cobalamin, Folate, Pyridoxine, and Colecalciferol support the one-carbon and metabolic lane.

  5. D05

    Fibre structure.

    Biotin, Pantothenic Acid, and Colecalciferol support the structural environment in which new hair is built.

  6. D06

    Oxidative pressure.

    Luteolin, Ascorbic Acid, and Pyridoxine support the redox lane; Luteolin × Ascorbic Acid is worked in FIG. 04.

FIG. 04 Luteolin × Ascorbic Acid — one pair worked in full.

Luteolin × Ascorbic Acid is the first Matrix × Circuit dependency — the coupling the formulation load-bears on, shown here in full. It is the pair a sceptical reader can check in thermodynamic detail.

Luteolin CATECHOL · REDUCED Semiquinone ONE-ELECTRON o-Quinone TWO-ELECTRON –e⁻ · ROS –e⁻ · ROS + ASCORBATE + ASCORBATE E° Luteolin•/Luteolin ≈ +600 mV · E° Asc•⁻/Ascorbate ≈ +282 mV (pH 7) Luteolin CATECHOL · REDUCED Semiquinone ONE-ELECTRON o-Quinone TWO-ELECTRON –e⁻ · ROS –e⁻ · ROS + ASCORBATE + ASCORBATE E° Lut•/Lut ≈ +600 mV E° Asc•⁻/Asc ≈ +282 mV (pH 7)

Ascorbate sits below Luteolin in the antioxidant pecking order — a competent electron donor to both intermediates. The amber return path is the regeneration: every −e⁻ oxidation step has a paired +ascorbate reduction step, so Luteolin re-enters the reduced state at both stages.

Reaction Luteolin enters reversible one-electron and two-electron oxidation states.
Potentials Luteolin•/Luteolin ≈ +600 mV · Asc•⁻/Ascorbate ≈ +282 mV at pH 7.
Interpretation Ascorbate is competent to regenerate reduced Luteolin at both intermediates.
Read the chemistry

Luteolin's catechol B-ring (the 3′,4′-dihydroxy ring) undergoes reversible one-electron oxidation to a phenoxyl / semiquinone radical, and by a second oxidation to the o-quinone. Both intermediates are reversible. The one-electron redox potential of Luteolin•/Luteolin sits at ~ +600 mV at pH 7; Ascorbate's couple at ≈ +282 mV. Ascorbate therefore sits below Luteolin in the antioxidant pecking order and is a competent electron donor to both intermediates — regenerating reduced Luteolin for the next redox turn. The ascorbyl radical produced either disproportionates or is reduced back to ascorbate by cellular reductase systems.

Scope of the claim.

The regeneration cycle holds for the reversible intermediates. Luteolin consumed by nucleophilic adduct formation (e.g. with GSH or protein Cys residues), by radical–radical coupling, or by ring-opening / hydrolytic degradation, exits the pool and is not recoverable by ascorbate. The cycle sustains across the reversible window; the fraction of Luteolin that stays inside that window depends on local thiol tone, radical flux, and formulation physics — not on dose alone.

Iida et al, 2024 · Wölfle et al, 2011 · Buettner, 1993 · Jovanovic et al, 1994.

Research updates.

Get the next paper when it lands.

Batch 002 readout is expected Q3 2026. We send Research updates when the record changes.

§ 05.

The computation.

The formulation problem is not find an ingredient that helps. Given six greying drivers and a realistic two-capsule dose envelope, the question is: which compounds, at which doses, at which forms, answer each driver without compromising another? Computation is how Hair Labs held more than six hundred candidates comparable on the same terms.

The literature supplies the mechanisms. In silico pairwise modelling supplies the constraint filter. The Clinical Advisory Board analyses the protocol before release. The computation's work is the apparatus — deciding which compounds survive the five constraints when put against every other.

Read the method — five steps
  1. 01

    Reads the literature.

    Structured literature mapping turns twenty years of papers on melanocyte stem-cell biology, the methylation cycle, trichology, and follicular oxidative chemistry into a corpus indexed by mechanism, not by compound. Candidate compounds are then judged against the driver they act on.

  2. 02

    Pairs every compound against every other.

    Candidate compounds are enumerated as pairs and scored on five constraints (see FIG. 03): redox compatibility, cofactor dependency, methylation-lane fit, absorption and form, and two-capsule discipline. Pharmacology at this breadth is tractable by a model, not by hand.

  3. 03

    Compares interactions under two models.

    Each pair is evaluated against standard pharmacological interaction models — Bliss independence for probabilistic effects, Loewe additivity for dose-equivalent effects. These are guardrails: they keep possible synergy, additivity, and antagonism explicit in the score rather than assumed. This is where a claim like Luteolin × Ascorbic Acid has to land on real thermodynamics or be retired.

  4. 04

    Eliminates the conflicts.

    Pairs that fail any constraint are dropped or re-formed. Ascorbic Acid's form is chosen to regenerate Luteolin's oxidised intermediates rather than compete with them; copper is dosed as gluconate to coexist with the vitamin complex without displacing zinc absorption; choline is preferred over higher-dose betaine to stay inside the two-capsule envelope.

  5. 05

    Surfaces the set that survives every constraint.

    The remainder — five Matrix compounds and eight Circuit compounds across the six systems, each at scored dose and form — goes to the Clinical Advisory Board before Batch 001 is released.

More than six hundred candidates reduced to one greying protocol — five Matrix compounds and eight Circuit compounds that hold the pairwise constraints at scored dose and form.

§ 06.

What was rejected.

Every accepted compound is the product of rejecting many others. The exclusions carry as much information as the inclusions — they document the discipline the formulation is written under. Four rejections stand for the set.

  1. 01.

    Fo-Ti (Polygonum multiflorum).

    Verdict

    Rejected — hepatotoxicity signal in the clinical literature.

    Read the reasoning

    Raw and processed Fo-Ti root preparations are documented causes of drug-induced liver injury in the published clinical literature. WHO pharmacovigilance reviews and repeated case series report hepatotoxicity presenting as cholestatic or mixed injury; the UK MHRA has historically issued safety warnings on products containing the herb. Hair Labs does not formulate against a target that carries a live hepatic safety signal.

  2. 02.

    PABA (para-aminobenzoic acid).

    Verdict

    Rejected — flagged for safety concerns at the doses historically used.

    Read the reasoning

    Positioned historically as a pigmentation supplement following mid-twentieth-century case reports. Regulatory scrutiny (Health Canada, EFSA) has flagged safety concerns at the doses historically used, including rare but reported hepatitis. The formulation does not rely on this category.

  3. 03.

    Oral catalase.

    Verdict

    Rejected — pharmacokinetically incapable of acting where it would need to.

    Read the reasoning

    Catalase is the enzyme that clears hydrogen peroxide in the follicle; the deficit is local. Oral catalase is a protein and is proteolysed in the gastrointestinal tract before it reaches the follicle — it cannot act at the site. The correct intervention on this driver is upstream: reducing the peroxide load and supporting the redox chemistry that preserves endogenous catalase activity. That is how Anti Grey 1.0 is constructed.

  4. 04.

    Stack more ingredients.

    Verdict

    Rejected — dose compression dilutes every compound below scored effect.

    Read the reasoning

    The commercial convention in the category is twenty or thirty actives in an undisclosed blend. Dose compression dilutes each compound below the threshold at which the published literature reports an effect, and no single driver is answered at scored dose. The formulation discipline here is the opposite: fewer compounds, each at the dose the literature scored, packed into an envelope small enough to survive daily adherence.

A formulation is the sum of its rejections.

§ 07.

First readout.

Batch 001 is an observed respondent corpus, not a clinical endpoint. It sits here as an early field signal after the mechanism, formulation, computation, and rejection ledger.

OBSERVED OUTCOMES · BATCH 001 n = 60 · months 3–6 on protocol
Less new grey 92%
Thicker, fuller hair 89%
Less shedding 87%
Stronger, less brittle 76%
Corpus

Batch 001 respondents on oral Anti Grey 1.0.

Denominator

60 respondents answered the standardised question set. The wider 127 review count is separate and never used as an outcome denominator.

Window

Months 3–6 on protocol, when new growth can begin to show whether fewer new greys are forming.

Method

Respondent corpus · standardised question set · oral protocol only.

Boundary

Field signal only. The literature, six-driver model, formulation architecture, and pairwise apparatus carry the primary proof burden.

On the 76% — why the slowest outcome is the one we keep

The four percentages are the four outcomes asked in the standardised question set. Hair Labs publishes the smaller strength figure alongside the larger pigment, density, and shedding signals because no outcome is withheld.

Respondent-reported outcomes are not clinical endpoints. The standardised question set is available on request.

§ 08.

Clinical Advisory Board and Education Faculty.

Hair Labs works with clinicians, trichologists, doctors, and pharmacist-manufacturing partners across the biology of hair ageing. Anti Grey 1.0 is the first protocol to pass through that advisory system.

  1. Clinical Advisory Board · 01

    Penny James

    Consultant Trichologist · IAT · IOT

    London, United Kingdom. Practices in New York.

    Analysed the formula from a clinical trichology perspective and advised on how the protocol should read against real presentations of ageing hair, pigment change, scalp health, and hair quality.

  2. Clinical Advisory Board · 02

    Dr Michael Ryan

    Board-certified Trichologist · MIT · AIT · PsyD

    London, United Kingdom.

    Reviewed the pigment-biology and trichology framing of the protocol.

  3. Clinical Advisory Board · 03

    Dr Jerusa Brignardello

    Nutrition scientist · PhD, Imperial College London

    Oxford, United Kingdom.

    Reviewed the stress physiology, adaptogen, and nutrition-science context around maintaining hair pigmentation over time.

  4. Education Faculty · Melanocyte biology

    Dr Mandy Prabhakar

    Aesthetics Doctor / GP · MBBS, Imperial College London

    Cambridge and Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.

    Journal field: melanocyte stem-cell reserve and pigment biology.

  5. Education Faculty · Systems biology

    Dr Pari Oza

    Family physician · Aesthetic medicine · University of Toronto adjunct lecturer

    Toronto, Canada.

    Journal field: systems biology, oxidative stress, and follicular signalling.

  6. Education Faculty · Clinical trichology

    Hayley Handy

    Trichologist · IAT-trained · 20 years in hair and scalp practice

    United Kingdom.

    Journal field: clinical trichology and multifactorial follicle health.

The full Clinical Advisory Board page carries CAB member detail, Education Faculty, protocol context, and manufacturing standards.

§ 09.

References.

Primary literature cited in this document.

  1. Nishimura, E. K., Granter, S. R., & Fisher, D. E. (2005). Mechanisms of hair graying: incomplete melanocyte stem cell maintenance in the niche. Science.Read ↗

  2. Zhang, B., Ma, S., Rachmin, I., et al. (2020). Hyperactivation of sympathetic nerves drives depletion of melanocyte stem cells. Nature.Read ↗

  3. Rosenberg, A. M., Rausser, S., Ren, J., et al. (2021). Quantitative mapping of human hair greying and reversal in relation to life stress. eLife.Read ↗

  4. Sun, Q., Lee, W., Hu, H.-Y., et al. (2023). Dedifferentiation maintains melanocyte stem cells in a dynamic niche. Nature.Read ↗

  5. Iida, M., Tazaki, A., Yajima, I., et al. (2024). Anti-Graying Effects of External and Internal Treatments with Luteolin on Hair in Model Mice. Antioxidants.Read ↗

  6. Slominski, A., Zmijewski, M. A., & Pawelek, J. (2012). L-tyrosine and L-dihydroxyphenylalanine as hormone-like regulators of melanocyte functions. Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research.Read ↗

  7. Chandrasekhar, K., Kapoor, J., & Anishetty, S. (2012). A prospective, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of a high-concentration full-spectrum extract of ashwagandha root in reducing stress and anxiety in adults. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine.Read ↗

  8. Darbinyan, V., Aslanyan, G., Amroyan, E., et al. (2007). Clinical trial of Rhodiola rosea L. extract SHR-5 in the treatment of mild to moderate depression. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry.Read ↗

  9. Bhat, R. M., Sharma, R., Pinto, A. C., Dandekeri, S., & Martis, J. (2013). Epidemiological and investigative study of premature graying of hair in higher secondary and pre-university school children. International Journal of Trichology.Read ↗

  10. Daulatabad, D., Singal, A., Grover, C., & Chhillar, N. (2017). Prospective analytical controlled study evaluating serum biotin, vitamin B12, and folic acid in patients with premature canities. International Journal of Trichology.Read ↗

  11. Wölfle, U., Esser, P. R., Simon-Haarhaus, B., et al. (2011). UVB-induced DNA damage, generation of reactive oxygen species, and inflammation are effectively attenuated by the flavonoid Luteolin in vitro and in vivo. Free Radical Biology and Medicine.Read ↗

  12. Wood, J. M., Decker, H., Hartmann, H., et al. (2009). Senile hair graying: H₂O₂-mediated oxidative stress affects human hair color by blunting methionine sulfoxide repair. FASEB Journal.Read ↗

  13. Trüeb, R. M. (2009). Oxidative stress in ageing of hair. International Journal of Trichology.Read ↗

  14. Buettner, G. R. (1993). The pecking order of free radicals and antioxidants: lipid peroxidation, α-tocopherol, and ascorbate. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics.Read ↗

  15. Jovanovic, S. V., Steenken, S., Tosic, M., Marjanovic, B., & Simic, M. G. (1994). Flavonoids as antioxidants. Journal of the American Chemical Society.Read ↗

§ 10.

What is published next.

Hair Labs is a research practice. Anti Grey 1.0 is the first protocol from the greying model; Batch 002 and Anti Grey 2.0 are already under pairwise review. This record is amended as the literature, corpus, and formulation move.

BATCH 002

Respondent corpus collecting at Kensington, London. First readout expected Q3 2026. The standardised question set is unchanged, so Batch 001 and Batch 002 sit on the same axis.

ANTI GREY 2.0

The next formulation is modelled in public against this one. Candidate additions — and any Matrix or Circuit revisions — are reasoned here, driver by driver, as the pairwise apparatus clears or rejects each one. Never silently.

THE RECORD

References are added as new peer-reviewed work lands on the six drivers. The record is amended in public as the literature and formulation move.

§ 11.

Evidence notes.

Method, denominator, computation, and claim boundary — the parts a sceptical reader should be able to check.

  1. On the 3–6 month window.

    Hair grows approximately one centimetre per month. A follicle-root protocol reads through newly formed hair, not the shaft already visible.

    Quality, texture, strength, and shedding can move first. Pigment biology is slower because fewer new greys can only be judged through new growth, which is why Batch 001 is reported at months 3–6.

  2. On the observed outcomes.

    The outcome percentages use only the respondents who answered the standardised Batch 001 question set. The wider product review count is separate and is not used to calculate those percentages.

    The chart publishes every outcome asked in that corpus: less new grey, fuller or thicker hair, less shedding, and stronger strands.

  3. On hair gummies and greens powders.

    Anti Grey 1.0 is not built as a category stack. It is written to the six-driver map of greying, then constrained by dose, form, pair compatibility, and the two-capsule envelope.

    The NooPigment Matrix (§ 03), pairwise apparatus (FIG. 03), Luteolin × Ascorbic Acid worked example (FIG. 04), rejections ledger (§ 06), and contributor review (§ 07) are the difference.

  4. On computation.

    Anti Grey 1.0 is written by people. Pairwise modelling holds the bookkeeping: more than six hundred candidates upstream, then seventy-eight compound pairs across the finished Matrix and Circuit.

    The computation does not write claims, replace contributor review, or substitute for the literature under each compound. It keeps the constraint problem checkable.

  5. On reversal.

    Prevention is the claim. Anti Grey 1.0 is written to reduce new greying by supporting the six systems pigment biology depends on.

    Reversibility remains biologically serious: Rosenberg et al., 2021 documented natural repigmentation along individual human hair shafts. That observation belongs in the science. It is not a product promise.

  6. On provenance.

    Anti Grey 1.0 is formulated and compounded by registered UK pharmacists in Kensington, London. Batch 001 first entered protocol use in September 2025; the month 3–6 respondent corpus was collected after that first use window.

    US fulfilment opened after the first readout. The full ingredient panel, excipients, and practical protocol notes live on the product page.

The product this research is written against.

Anti Grey 1.0.

Batch 001 · Kensington, London · US fulfilment open

Begin